Love Society

Top 7 Questions for State Attorneys Generals Protecting the Consumer from Fraud?

By: Lance Winslow

There is a big debate out there as whether the States Attorneys Generals actually help consumers and investors from fraud. If a company makes an error in a disclosure document, form or filing, is it automatically fraud? Or simply a mistake in a sea of over regulation and impossible stipulations that we know are stifling free-enterprise.

When an Attorney General files a lawsuit on a company and that company is made to pay, then those extortion fines are in fact passed on to future consumers and therefore who did it really help? We know it helps Attorney Generals with political aspirations pad their resumes to run for higher office, yet who does this really serve?

Some say if the Attorneys General does not serve the taxpayer then that; “Attorney general is not going to make an effort to check to see if there is a problem, eliminate the position.” And others say;

Well, the Attorneys General is busy with other things I suppose and remember it is a VERY political position too. Well they are Lawyers and Lawyers are paid to lie, that is their job! That is why so many run for political office. But alas are they are too busy commandeering the plastic shovels and telling the teacher they need next years budget for more plastic shovels and Sand Castle plastic molds.

One has to ask these questions and wonder with all these issues, surely we can do a better job in our government to protect the consumer and not harass the business community. Otherwise we really do not need these folks in our government, as they serve no interests but their own. Consider all this in 2006 and the flip side, what would happen if they were eliminated and did not exist?

Lance Winslow - Online Think Tank forum board. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/wttbbs/

Related to Politics Guide

  • Elliot Spitzer, are the Rats Leaving the Ship
  • Retired Generals - Should We Listen to Them?
  • Rants by Lance: BRAC Committee Talks Irrelevant Completely
  • How Many Government Agencies Are Involved with Employee Credit Card Fraud?
  • Protecting Consumers Against Fraud and Deception
  • The Federal Trade Commission, reality check
  • The Justice Department Will Save The American People from the Boggy Man
  • Some Retired Generals Want Rumsfeld to Go!
  • Divorce Lawyers - What to Look for in a Divorce Attorney
  • Federal Trade Commission Will Not Monitor MLM Companies
  • Liberal Writers Protect Government Credit Card Fraud
  • Fort Worth Divorce Attorneys
  • Consumer Buying Guidlines
  • Fixing Our Regulatory Sewage and Minutia Problems
  • Double Standards for Regulators?
  • New York Lawyers; Vindictive Government Prosecutors
  • Embellishment, Misrepresentation and the Federal Trade Commission
  • Selecting a Divorce Attorney
  • Deciding On Spousal Support
  • Wendy’s Finger In Chili Should Send a Message
  • Federal Trade Commission Franchising Division; Inept?
  • The Federal Trade Commission Fiscal Year 2007 Congressional Budget Justification is Flawed Indeed
  • Failure to Supervise at the Federal Trade Commission
  • California Attorneys and Politicians
  • Federal Trade Commission Falsely Purports Franchise Disclosure is Cost Effective
  • Leave a Reply

     

    Close
    E-mail It